Skip to main content

critique of lesson plan


The four consecutive lesson plans created by Carolyn Wilhelm focuses on teaching students to compose found poetry.

The objectives of these lessons are clearly stated which is an important factor to start with when is writing a lesson plan.

The first lesson introduces the topic of found poetry in a clear yet subtle way. Before introducing the “exciting” part – the performance, the students are asked to discuss and analyze this new form of poetry. I like that the class will create a collaborative definition to explain what found poetry is.

Each consecutive lesson is linked to the lesson before using a handout or review. This allows recapture of focus in minimal amount of time.  

The planning sheet handout is a great tool to help the students learn how to write this type of poem. In general, handouts are great to assist step by step guided instruction.

The self-reflection at the end is a great tool for honest evaluation of performance. It helps students notice areas that can use critique and allows them to analyze their own performance as well as the performance of others.
I like that the teacher uses the idea of a gradual release by sampling with her poem first and then having the class write a collaborative poem. However, I was expecting to see the end of the lesson where each student creates their own poem based on a new book. That would assess whether or not the students have gained the skill to write this kind of poem.
In general, this lesson plan seems very engaging and informative. Yet, the fact that the lesson is missing the guided and independent practice parts upsets me a bit. Also, why is there a performance for creating a group poem?? Aren't performances a major event?
To improve this lesson I would have every child create their own poem - a masterpiece and have each student read their poem to the audience at the performance. 

Comments

  1. Hi Chana Kayla,
    I agree with you, having a the class create a poem together is a good practice for the students, who should eventually go on to create their own poem, I imagine that since the lesson was created for grades K-2, each teacher must modify their objectives according to their students' age and experience.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chana Kayla, you definitely bought up excellent points. I agree that the teacher did not give enough opportunities for independent work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Strengths and needs

This student seems to have good decoding skills. Her accuracy rate is 94%, which is very good. Yet, every time she got stuck on a word she hesitated to try reading it and seemed lost. The child self-corrected herself  1 out of every 4 times she erred, which is the borderline indication that the student is self-monitoring herself. Her rate of error was only 1 out of every 17 words. The student was able to read fluently with little teacher support. Also, the student seemed to confuse the sight word "to" with "it." There were two mistakes that I noticed throughout the passage. Firstly, she read the word "must" as "most." Second, she added on an "ed" to the word "live" several times. The child used visual cues and meaning to help her decode the hard words. Her rate of error was only 1 out of every 19 words As per comprehension skills, the student was able to recall what the passage was about. She stated the comparisons and differ...
 https://edli635sp18t https://edli635sp18ttidrhsu.blogspot.com/ tidrhsu.blogspot.com/ Abigail Himy Annie Brach Chava Levovitz Chaya Neuberger Dina Kohn Faigy Herzog Gitty Adler Gitty Feldman Kayla Marx Michelle Rosenfeld Pessy Schwartz Rachel Wagschal Rebecca Jacobs Rochel Weiss Rochel Yudkovsky Shaindy Gold Tammy Friedman